Ramesh Sarva Veba: 6707A Penalties & 419 Plans Litigation: 412i,419, lawsuits, IRS audits

Ramesh Sarva Veba: 6707A Penalties & 419 Plans Litigation: 412i,419, lawsuits, IRS audits

6 comments:

  1. Ramesh Sarva Veba
    Defendant Ramesh Sarva is a CPA who has been steering his customers toward VEBA plans for over 20 years- and in particular, toward Sea Nine-administered VEBA plans. He promotes the plans' false benefits while also rebroadcasting the false statements that Elliot and Sea Nine make about the plans they operate and administer. Benistar

    SARVA
    Defendants have also directly and indirectly promoted the VEBA plan scheme to prospective participants. Sarva for his part has been marketing Sea Nine's VEBA plans to customers across the United States for nearly 30 years- even before Elliot became involved- and continues to do this today.
    Posted by Lance Wallach at 1/07/2014 04:30:00 PM 6 comments:
    Email This
    BlogThis!
    Share to Twitter
    Share to Facebook
    Share to Pinterest

    Labels: Kae Consulting, Kenneth Elliot, Ramesh Sarva, Sarva, Sea Nine Veba, Vista Barranca
    Sarva- More You Should Know
    Sarva has similarly made numerous false statements to his customers about the Sea Nine VEBA plans despite his notice that they are not compliant with Section 419A(f)(6). He touts his many years of work with Sea Nine VEBA plans to potential customers reassuring them that the plans are completely legal. He provides potential plan participants with materials (such as the legal opinions by Elliot and Sea Nine) indicating that after 2004 the Sea Nine plans were not in conformity with the relevant provisions of the Tax Code. And he has promoted the concept that participation in the Sea Nine VEBA plans permits underscoring the cash value nature of the universal or whole life policies that the plans purchase for their participants, even though (noted above) a VEBA plan that operates in this fashion evidences experience rating.
    Posted by Lance Wallach at 1/07/2014 02:05:00 PM 5 comments:
    Email This
    BlogThis!
    Share to Twitter
    Share to Facebook
    Share to Pinterest

    ReplyDelete
  2. Ramesh Sarva Veba
    Defendant Ramesh Sarva is a CPA who has been steering his customers toward VEBA plans for over 20 years- and in particular, toward Sea Nine-administered VEBA plans. He promotes the plans' false benefits while also rebroadcasting the false statements that Elliot and Sea Nine make about the plans they operate and administer. Benistar

    SARVA
    Defendants have also directly and indirectly promoted the VEBA plan scheme to prospective participants. Sarva for his part has been marketing Sea Nine's VEBA plans to customers across the United States for nearly 30 years- even before Elliot became involved- and continues to do this today.
    Posted by Lance Wallach at 1/07/2014 04:30:00 PM 6 comments:
    Email This
    BlogThis!
    Share to Twitter
    Share to Facebook
    Share to Pinterest

    Labels: Kae Consulting, Kenneth Elliot, Ramesh Sarva, Sarva, Sea Nine Veba, Vista Barranca
    Sarva- More You Should Know
    Sarva has similarly made numerous false statements to his customers about the Sea Nine VEBA plans despite his notice that they are not compliant with Section 419A(f)(6). He touts his many years of work with Sea Nine VEBA plans to potential customers reassuring them that the plans are completely legal. He provides potential plan participants with materials (such as the legal opinions by Elliot and Sea Nine) indicating that after 2004 the Sea Nine plans were not in conformity with the relevant provisions of the Tax Code. And he has promoted the concept that participation in the Sea Nine VEBA plans permits underscoring the cash value nature of the universal or whole life policies that the plans purchase for their participants, even though (noted above) a VEBA plan that operates in this fashion evidences experience rating.
    Posted by Lance Wallach at 1/07/2014 02:05:00 PM 5 comments:
    Email This
    BlogThis!
    Share to Twitter
    Share to Facebook
    Share to Pinterest

    ReplyDelete

  3. RAMESH SARVA: IRS Clarifies Legality of 419(e) Plans
    RAMESH SARVA: IRS Clarifies Legality of 419(e) Plans
    Posted by Lance Wallach at 3/27/2015 06:52:00 AM
    Email This
    BlogThis!
    Share to Twitter
    Share to Facebook
    Share to Pinterest

    Labels: 412i, 412i Plans, 419, 419 Plans, Lance Wallach, Lance Wallach Expert Witness, Retirement Plans, tax penalties, Welfare Benefit Plans
    2 comments:

    Lance WallachMarch 27, 2015 at 6:52 AM
    RAMESH SARVA
    Defendant Ramesh Sarva is a CPA who has been steering his customer toward VEBA plans for over 20 years- and in particular, toward Sea Nine-administered VEBA plans. He promotes the plans' false benefits while also rebroadcasting the false statements that Elliot and Sea Nine make about the plans they operateand administer. Benistar

    Tuesday, January 6, 2015
    2 Complaints and reviews for '419 Plan' from real people @ Pissed Consumer

    ReplyDelete

    ReplyDelete
  4. Ramesh Sarva Veba: 6707A Penalties & 419 Plans Litigation

    ReplyDelete
  5. United States Attorney
    'S'P Federal Building, Room 7211 <.} .... ~ 7 300 North Los Angeles Street
    Los Angeles, California 90012
    8 Tel: (213) 894-2740; Fax: (213) 894-0115
    9 Email: darwin.thomas@usdoj.gov
    BRIAN H. CORCORAN (DC Bar No. 456976)
    10 Trial Attorney, Tax Division
    11 U.S. Department of Justice
    Post Office Box 7238
    12 Washington, D.C. 20044
    13 Tel: (202) 353-7421; Fax (202) 514-6770
    14 Email: Brian.H.Corcoran@usdoj .gov
    15 Attorneys for the United States of America
    16
    17
    18
    19
    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
    CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
    WESTERN DIVISION
    20 United States of America,
    21
    ' 22
    Plaintiff,
    vs.
    COMPLAINT FOR PERMANENT
    INJUNCTION AND OTHER
    RELIEF
    23 Kenneth Elliott d/b/a KAE Insurance Service~ Inc., Vista Barranca, Inc.,
    24 and KA~ Consulting· Sea Nine
    Associates, Inc., and Ramesh Sarva,
    25
    26
    27
    28
    Defendants. _______________

    ReplyDelete
  6. NC., §
    §
    Plaintiffs, §
    §
    v. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:13-CV-4491-B
    §
    SEA NINE ASSOCIATES, INC., et al., §
    §
    Defendants. §
    MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
    Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion to Remand (doc. 14), filed December 6, 2013. For the
    reasons stated below, the Court finds that the Motion should be, and hereby is, GRANTED.
    I.
    BACKGROUND
    This case arises out of fraudulent representations that Defendants allegedly made in order
    to induce Plaintiffs to invest in employee benefit plans that ultimately did not possess the tax-exempt
    qualities that Plaintiffs insist they were promised. Plaintiffs are Naren and Ilakamuri Patel, who 1
    reside in New York state, and MVP Consulting Plus, Inc., a New York corporation with its principal
    place of business in Albany, New York. Doc. 1-3, Orig. Pet. Ex. C ¶¶ 4.01-4.02. Defendants are
    Prudential Insurance Company (“Prudential”), Comerica Bank (“Comerica”), Sea Nine Associates,
    Inc. (“Sea Nine”), Kenneth Elliot, Ramesh Sarva, Ramesh Sarva, CPA, P.C., Gaurang Parikh, and
    The Court draws the relevant background facts from the Plaintiffs’ Original Petition, filed in state 1
    court. Doc. 1-3, Orig. Pet. Ex. C.

    ReplyDelete