Showing posts with label OVDI. Show all posts
Showing posts with label OVDI. Show all posts

FBAR/OVDI LANCE WALLACH: IRS FBAR Voluntary Disclosure Initiative, opt out ...

FBAR/OVDI LANCE WALLACH: IRS FBAR Voluntary Disclosure Initiative, opt out ...:  Lance Wallach The 2012 OVDI, which is still open, is patterned after the 2011 OVDI, but increases the maximum Report of Foreign Ban...

























Tidbits from the IRS on Offshore Account Issues (6/7/14)

I understand from practitioners that the IRS has indicated the following.  This is second hand, so those desiring to implement strategy based on the following might make their own inquiries to the IRS.

1.  Readers may be aware that some or all Swiss Category 2 banks are requesting the U.S. depositor to supply proof of U.S. tax compliance.  That proof can be used to mitigate the Swiss Category 2 bank's penalty in the program with the U.S. DOJ.  In my limited experience with such requests, the banks may ask for various forms of proof (from the IRS preclearance letter into OVDP to the Form 906).  The U.S. depositor is not required to provide that proof to the Swiss bank, of course.*  The question has arisen, however, what if anything to provide the Swiss bank if the request comes after the U.S. depositor has submitted the request for preclearance but has not yet received the IRS letter of preclearance.  I understand that the IRS believes banks will accept the preclearance request letter and perhaps a letter from the taxpayer or the representative to the bank that the preclearance request letter was filed and  has not yet been acted on.  I am sure the bank will make a follow through request for something more definite.

2.  Clients concerned about the interim period between deciding to do something (whether OVDP or streamlined) might make a preclearance letter request for OVDP and then, if streamlined is appropriate, withdraw from OVDP.  The advantage of filing the preclearance where the ultimate choice to do OVDP is not made is that the process of dealing with the issue, having been started with the preclearance letter, should be some protection if the IRS starts an audit later before the alternative strategy is implemented.  If, after filing the preclearance letter, the client decides to pursue another strategy, the client should withdraw by letter advising of the withdrawal submitted before the due date for the intake letter to CI.  The letter should be clear that the client is withdrawing.  (Note, withdrawal is not the same as opting out; hence, unless the client qualifies for and completes streamlined procedure, the client will not have assurance of no criminal prosecution.)  As I received the information, this withdrawal process might work also for later determining to proceed in some other way under 2011-13.  Both the streamlined and the 2011-13, here, routes offer considerable uncertainties, but perhaps these uncertainties may be mitigated by the upcoming changes in the program that Commissioner Koskinen announced were coming.  See IRS Commissioner Koskinen Announces that Changes -- Liberalizations -- Are In the Offing for OVDP 2012 (Federal Tax Crimes Blog 6/4/12), here.

3.  If the client does not withdraw, the case will be processed under OVDP under normal procedures with the right to opt out.







FBAR/OVDI LANCE WALLACH: The IRS has kicked out an undisclosed number of ta...

FBAR/OVDI LANCE WALLACH: The IRS has kicked out an undisclosed number of ta...: Lance Wallach We have written at least 75 posts about the Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Program (called OVDI or OVDP) and the need t...

















Lawyer 4 Audits .com
"Tipping the scales of justice in 
your favor."
Defending and protecting businesses and financial professionals from IRS audits, 
Insurance companies and Brokerage firms.
Our Lawyers, CPAs & the Nation's Leading 
Financial experts will help you deal with IRS 
audits & all problems related to 419, 412i, 
section 79, captive insurance & other abusive 
insurance plans.
We will work to recover your losses from the stock 
market & abusive insurance based plans from the 
insurance companies, brokerage firms
& banks.
The following are a small sample of the professional 
books our Legal & Tax Audit Experts have authored:
New & best selling American Institute of Certified Public Accountants 
books & courses:

  • Avoiding Circular 230 Malpractice Traps and Common Abusive Small Business Hot Spots
  • The Team Approach to Tax, Financial & Estate Planning
  • Practical Alternatives to Commonly Misused and Abused Small Business Tax Strategies: Ensuring Your Client's Future.
  • Fraud... Incompetence and Scams published by John Wiley and Sons

Books by Bisk CPEasy, the nation's largest provider of Professional 
education:

  • The CPA's Guide to Life Insurance
  • The CPA's Guide to Federal & Estate Gift Taxation

By the National Society of Accountants

  • Wealth Preservation Planning
516-938-5007
The Law Offices of Mark Levinson ESQ.Copyright (C) 2014 Lawyer4Audits.com
All rights reserved.
Our Professional Services >>
  • 419 & 412 plan defense
  • Employee benefit plan audits/penalty resolution
  • IRS Audit assistance
  • Plan reviews, evaluations & remediation
  • Expert Witness testimony
  • FBAR undisclosed foreign asset reporting (IRS)
  • Research & Analysis of Tax Laws
  • Providing Guidance for Businesses, Attorneys, CPAs Insurance professionals nationwide.
  • Stock market, Mutual fund & Insurance loss recovery
  • Life Settlement Lawsuits
  • Premium Financing Lawsuits
  • Retirement Plan Lawsuits

Servicing Individuals and Businesses Nationwide.
A few of our recent 
successful resolutions 
for our clients:
Click here
"Our expert witness, Lance Wallach 
has never lost a case!"
StatCounter - Free Web Tracker and Counter
IRS Attacks Business Owners in 419, 412, Section 79 and Captive Insurance Plans 
Under Section 6707A
By Lance Wallach

Taxpayers who previously adopted 
419, 412i, captive
insurance or 
Section 79 plans are in big trouble.

In recent years, the IRS has identified many of these arrangements as abusive devices to funnel tax 
deductible dollars to shareholders and classified these
arrangements as listed transactions." These plans were sold by insurance agents, financial planners, 
accountants and attorneys seeking large life insurance
commissions. In general, taxpayers who engage in a
 “listed transaction” must report such transaction to the 
IRS on 
Form 8886 every year that they “participate” in
the transaction, and you do not necessarily have to make a contribution or claim a tax deduction to 
participate. 
Section 6707A of the Code imposes severe penalties
for failure to file Form 8886 with respect to a listed transaction. But you are also in trouble if you file 
incorrectly. I have received numerous phone calls from
business owners who filed and still got fined. Not only do you have to file Form 8886, but it also has to be 
prepared correctly. I only know of two people in the U.
S. who have filed these forms properly for clients. They tell me that was after hundreds of hours of research 
and over 50 phones calls to various IRS personnel.
The filing instructions for Form 8886 presume a timely filling. Most people file late and follow the directions 
for currently preparing the forms. Then the IRS fines
the business owner. The tax court does not have jurisdiction to abate or lower such penalties imposed by the 
IRS. 
Read more here
How to Avoid IRS Fines for You and Your ClientsPublished: 2010/2011

By Lance Wallach
Beware: The IRS is cracking down on small-business owners who participate in tax-reduction insurance plans sold by insurance 
agents, including defined benefit retirement plans, IRAs, and even 401(k) plans with life insurance. In these cases, the business owner 
is motivated by a large tax deduction; the insurance agent is motivated by a substantial commission.

A few years ago, I testified as an expert witness in a case in which a physician was in an abusive 401(k) plan with life insurance. It had 
a so-called “springing cash value policy” in it. The IRS calls plans with these types of policies “listed transactions.” The judge called 
the insurance agent “a crook.”
If your client was currently is in a 412(i),
 419, captive insurance, or Section 79 plan, they may be in big trouble. Accountants who 
signed a tax return for a client in one of these plans may be what the IRS calls a “material advisor” and subject to a maximum 
$200,000 fine.

If you are an insurance professional who sold or advised on one of these plans, the same holds true for you. 
Read more here!
FBAR Foreign Bank Account ReportingThe IRS is assessing huge penalties for undisclosed foreign bank 
accounts, assets & income.
 Click for more infoFBAR FILING DEADLING HAS BEEN EXTENDEDSpecialty: People from IndiaBreaking 419 plan news!  U.S. District Attorney sues Maven LLC, Tracy Sunderlage & SRG 
International for promoting illegal 419 welfare benefit plans.

Other plans face serious problems.  raided by IRS.  
Millenium files for bankruptcy, Niche out of business.  If you are in a 
419, 412i, captive insurance, or section 79 scam, the time to seek 
competent, experienced help is now.
Is opting out right for you? Click here to find out!
Our tax resolution offices 
have received calls
regarding the following 
companies or plans: 
CJA, CJA and 
Associates, Sea Nine Veba, 
Robin Weingast,Niche
Millennium
Jail time for failure to file TD F 90-22.1 Report of Foreign Bank and Financial AccountsA former UBS, AG ("UBS") client from Miami Beach, Florida was sentenced to four months in federal prison for 
willfully failing to file a Form TD F 90-22.1, Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts ("FBAR"), for the UBS 
account the man held with as much as $4,000,0000 in it. This information was released by the U.S. Attorney for the 
Southern District of Florida on July 25 2012.
The former UBS client paid a civil penalty of $2,000,000 related to the $4,000,000 high account balance stemming from 
tax year 2006. Additionally, the former UBS client was sentenced to four months in federal prison, three years of 
supervised release, 250 hours of community service and a $20,000 criminal fine.
The UBS account related to two offshore corporations owned by the man, one in the Virgin Islands and one in the 
Republic of Panama. These corporations opened accounts at UBS. The man was not named as the direct owner but 
instead he was deemed only the "beneficial owner." The accounts with UBS were opened from tax years 2005 
through 2007.
It is stated that the man was aware of the obligation on the FBAR to report as he had previously filed FBARs for other 
offshore corporations. An FBAR is required to be filed by both U.S. citizens and residents who have a financial 
interest in or signatory authority over a non-U.S. financial account with a value of more than $10,000 at any point 
during the tax year. The $10,000 amount is an aggregation of all non-U.S. financial accounts and not just an analysis 
on an account-by-account basis.
The information on the former UBS client was turned over after UBS agreed in February 2009 to pay $780,000,000 
under a deferred prosecution agreement to settle the claim that UBS conspired to defraud the U.S. by impeding the 
Internal Revenue Service ("IRS"). UBS also agreed to turn over information to the U.S. Department of Justice on 300 
account holders. Google Lance Wallach for more articles on point.
A US citizen or resident that held an account with UBS or any other institution that has not filed the necessary FBARs 
for the last eight tax years, should immediately reach out to get help to discuss any potential issues they may have 
and their alternatives. Filing for amnesty and then opting out are two options that our former IRS agents have 
successfully done for our clients. If not done properly it can be a disaster. We suggest you use a CPA with years of 
prior experience with the IRS international division.
Lance Wallach, National Society of Accountants Speaker of the Year and member of the AICPA faculty of teaching 
professionals, is a frequent speaker on FBAR, OVDI, IRS tax amnesty and opting-out abusive tax shelters, 
international tax, and estate planning.  He writes about 412(i), 419, Section79, FBAR, OVDI,  IRS tax amnesty and 
opting-out and captive insurance plans. He speaks at more than ten conventions annually, writes for over fifty 
publications, is quoted regularly in the press and has been featured on television and radio financial talk shows 
including NBC, National Public Radio’s All Things Considered, and others. Lance has written numerous books 
including Protecting Clients from Fraud, Incompetence and Scams published by John Wiley and Sons, Bisk Education’
s CPA’s Guide to Life Insurance and Federal Estate and Gift Taxation, as well as the AICPA best-selling books, 
including Avoiding Circular 230 Malpractice Traps and Common Abusive Small Business Hot Spots. He does expert 
witness testimony and has never lost a case. Contact him at 516.938.5007, wallachinc@gmail.com or lanwalla@aol.
com visit www.taxadvisorexperts.com  or www.Lawyer4Audits.com.

The information provided herein is not intended as legal, accounting, financial or any type of advice for any specific 
individual or other entity. You should contact an appropriate professional for any such advice.
FBAR fines, IRS coming after YOU

Lance Wallach
If you had money overseas you need to act now. The IRS is coming to get you. Many 
overseas banks are reporting to the IRS on people that had money in accounts. OVDI and 
opting out are ways to deal with some problems.

Many tax clients with unreported offshore accounts ask if they will receive the maximum 
penalties if they decide not to enter into the IRS’s tax amnesty program. That’s a great 
question considering the IRS uses the threat of severe penalties to gain compliance with 
the offshore reporting rules.
The current amnesty program, called the Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Program 
(sometimes called “OVDI” or “OVDP”), allows those with unreported foreign bank and 
brokerage accounts to pay a 27.5% penalty based on the highest balance of the 
unreported accounts during the last 8 years. That means if you have an account worth 
$800,000 today and $1 million in 2009, the IRS would extract a $275,000 penalty.
There are reduced penalties for small accounts and in certain other limited circumstances.
Why would anyone agree to such a huge civil penalty? The answer is simple. Failure to 
disclose an offshore account can be a felony if intentional and carries civil penalties of up 
to 50% of the highest balance for each year the account was unreported or $100,000 per 
year, whichever is higher. That means if you have owned a $500,000 account for the last 
4 years the penalty could be $1 million - an amount twice the value of the account! If you 
don’t believe us, just look at FAQ 12 on the IRS own OVDI website.
Most people who approach the voluntary disclosure program feel like they are between a 
rock and a hard place. Lose all your money and potentially go to prison versus paying a 
huge 27.5% penalty. Remember, the penalty is based on the value of the account. Most U.
S. taxpayers with offshore accounts have already paid tax on the money they earned. 
Unless the money is from drug dealing or other illegal activities, the money has already 
been taxed once.
There is hope, however.  The penalties most often quoted are for willful violations. Yes, 
there are some business people that intentionally try to hide money from the IRS or a 
spouse. Most violators, however, simply didn’t know about the law. The typical amnesty 
applicant is a dual national, an American living overseas, a foreign born American or a 
person sending money “home” to family in India, Mexico or China.
The IRS’ website does not draw a distinction between these groups. That causes many 
people who have truly made an honest mistake to needlessly panic.
Recently there has been a growing thought that the courts could strike down the FBAR* 
penalties law as a violation of the Eighth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. The Eight 
Amendment, adopted in 1791, says that “Excessive bail shall not be required, nor 
excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.” While most people 
think of criminal and death penalty cases, there is a growing body of law surrounding the 
“excessive fines” language. [*An FBAR is a Report of Foreign Bank and Financial 
Account, the form that U.S. taxpayers must use to report foreign financial accounts yearly.]
In 1998, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled it was unconstitutional to fine a person $357,144 
for failing to report cash in excess of $10,000 being removed from the country. Removing 
cash is not illegal just like opening a foreign account isn’t illegal. The law requires you to 
report both transactions, however.
In striking down the fine, the court found it was “grossly disproportionate” to the violation.
There is little guidance thus far from the courts, however the IRS has recognized the 
dangers in enforcing the 50% - per - year penalties on innocent violations. The Internal 
Revenue Manual used by IRS employee’s notes that the penalties established by 
Congress is the maximum amounts that can be imposed. Revenue agents are instructed 
to consider warning letters or lower penalties except in the most egregious cases. You 
need to be very careful and get good help. You get what you pay for. I am getting lots of 
calls from people in trouble because their accountants do not know what they are doing 
on these issues
If you have an unreported foreign account, contact a CPA experienced in foreign 
reporting requirements. The best would be someone who was in the international division 
of the IRS. He can probably tell you right away your situation and make suggestions. The 
decision to file under the OVDI amnesty program or seek a traditional disclosure is one 
that requires careful investigation. Once you make a traditional disclosure it is impossible 
to seek amnesty, however an amnesty applicant can always “opt out.”
Lance Wallach, National Society of Accountants Speaker of the Year and member of the 
American Institute of CPAs faculty of teaching professionals, is a frequent speaker on 
retirement plans, financial and estate planning, and abusive tax shelters.  He speaks at 
more than ten conventions annually and writes for over fifty publications. Lance has 
written numerous books including Protecting Clients from Fraud, Incompetence and 
Scams published by John Wiley and Sons, Bisk Education's CPA's Guide to Life Insurance 
and Federal Estate and Gift Taxation, as well as AICPA best-selling books, including 
Avoiding Circular 230 Malpractice Traps and Common Abusive Small Business Hot Spots. 
He does expert witness testimony and has never lost a case. Mr. Wallach may be reached 
at 516/938.5007, wallachinc@gmail.com, or at www.taxaudit419.com or www.lancewallach.
com.

The information provided herein is not intended as legal, accounting, financial or any type 
of advice for any specific individual or other entity. You should contact an appropriate 
professional for any such advice.
OVDI, FBAR, INTERNATIONAL TAX UPDATE: Deadlines, E-Filing Option and New IRS Form 8938
Lance Wallach
June 15, 2012
American taxpayers. person with a financial interest in, or signature or other authority over, any financial 
account outside the U.S. must file an annual report on Treasury Form TD F 90-22.1 Report of Financial 
Accounts, commonly known as an “FBAR” if the aggregate value of all such accounts exceeds 10,000 at any 
time during the calendar year. Unlike tax returns, which may be mailed on the filing deadline and be 
considered timely, the FBAR for 2011 must have been received by Treasury by June 30















Did you Participate in a 419 or 412i Benefit Plan?: FBAR/OVDI LANCE WALLACH: IRS FBAR Voluntary Disclo...

Did you Participate in a 419 or 412i Benefit Plan?: FBAR/OVDI LANCE WALLACH: IRS FBAR Voluntary Disclo...: FBAR/OVDI LANCE WALLACH: IRS FBAR Voluntary Disclosure Initiative, opt out ... :  Lance Wallach The 2012 OVDI, which is still open, is p...























Wednesday, April 10, 2013


IRS FBAR Voluntary Disclosure Initiative, opt out to reduce tax



 Lance Wallach


The 2012 OVDI, which is still open, is patterned after the 2011 OVDI, but increases the maximum Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts (FBAR)-related penalty from 25 percent to 27.5 percent of the highest account value at any time between 2003 and 2010. The 2012 OVDI does not have a stated expiration date. In all, the IRS has seen 33,000 voluntary disclosures from the 2009 and 2011 offshore initiatives. Since the 2011 program closed last September, hundreds of taxpayers have come forward to make voluntary disclosures.
Under the Bank Secrecy Act, U.S. residents or a person in and doing business in the U.S. must file a report with the government if they have a financial account in a foreign country with a value exceeding $10,000 at any time during the calendar year. Taxpayers comply with this law by reporting the account on their income tax return and by filing Form 90–22.1, the FBAR. Willfully failing to file an FBAR can be subject to both criminal sanctions (i.e., imprisonment) and civil penalties equivalent to the greater of $100,000 or 50 percent of the balance in an unreported foreign account — for each year since 2004 for which an FBAR wasn't filed.
The 2009 OVDP brought in at least 14,700 U.S. taxpayers (disclosing accounts in more than 60 countries) through the front door of IRS Criminal Investigation and untold thousands through a process of quietly amending returns and filing delinquent FBARs with the government. For eligible taxpayers who applied the OVDP provided the certainty of no criminal prosecution and civil penalty relief — they were required to pay back-taxes from 2003 to 2008, interest and a 20-25 percent penalty on the delinquent taxes. The IRS also imposed a 20 percent FBAR-related penalty equal to the highest aggregate value of the financial account between 2003 and 2008. In limited situations, the FBAR-related penalty could be reduced to five percent of the account value or $10,000 per tax year. If they got a great CPA with experience to help them, the fine was a lot less.
The 2011 OVDI, brought in an additional 12,000 eligible taxpayers who filed original and amended tax returns and agreed to make payments (or good-faith arrangements to pay) for taxes, interest and accuracy-related penalties. The 2011 OVDI FBAR-related penalty framework required a 25 percent “FBAR-related” penalty equal to the highest value of the financial account between 2003 and 2010. Only one 25 percent offshore penalty is to be applied with respect to voluntary disclosures relating to the same financial account. The penalty may be allocated among the taxpayers with beneficial ownership making the voluntary disclosures in any way they choose. . Participants in the 2011 OVDI also had to pay back-taxes and interest for up to eight years as well as paying accuracy-related and/or delinquency penalties. Subject to certain limitations, financial transactions occurring before 2003 were generally irrelevant for those participating in the OVDI. With good advice many people paid a lot less.
There are many considerations before a taxpayer should determine whether to pursue a voluntary disclosure of prior tax indiscretions. When reviewing the OVDP and the OVDI, many made decisions based on whether they could be considered a realistic candidate for a criminal prosecution referral by the IRS or prosecution by the Department of Justice. (If so, the determination to participate was relatively quick and easy). In other cases, the questions included:
  • Was there a possibility of reducing that prospect by filing amended or delinquent returns and FBARs in lieu of a direct participation in the OVDP/OVDI?
  • What would be the potentially applicable penalties upon an examination of such returns and FBARs?
  • Could the government actually carry their burden of demonstrating that the taxpayer “willfully” violated the FBAR filing requirements?
  • What would be the cost to the taxpayer of voluntary disclosure through OVDI versus remaining outside the program? Should they apply and then opt out?
Since the OVDI asserted an offshore penalty based on foreign financial accounts and asset valuations, for many with smaller financial account values the aggregate offshore penalty determination, even for multiple years, was actually less outside the OVDI.
The ability of a U.S. taxpayer to maintain an undisclosed, “secret” foreign financial account is fast becoming nonexistent. Foreign account information is flowing into the IRS under tax treaties, through submissions by whistle blowers, and from other taxpayers who participated in the 2009 OVDP and the 2011 OVDI who have been required to identify their bankers and advisers. Additional information will become available as the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA) foreign financial asset reporting (Form 8938 and new IRC § 6038D) become effective.
It is likely that the U.S. will require foreign financial institutions doing business in the United States to disclose account holders having relatively small accounts and earnings. There have been rumors of discussions regarding accounts having a high balance of the equivalent of $50,000 at any time between 2002 and 2010. U.S. persons having interests in foreign financial accounts should not find comfort in a belief that their foreign financial institution will somehow refrain from disclosing very small accounts in the current enforcement environment.
Taxpayers having undisclosed interests in foreign financial accounts must consult competent tax professionals before deciding to participate in the 2012 OVDI. Others may decide to risk detection by the IRS and the imposition of substantial penalties, including the civil fraud penalty, numerous foreign information return penalties, and the potential risk of criminal prosecution. Although the 2012 OVDI penalty regime may seem overly harsh for many, the decision to participate should include an economic analysis of the taxpayer's projected future earnings from funds held offshore. Some people have left the U.S. to try to avoid the fines.
Another option is to apply for amnesty and then opt out and go to appeals. We think that for most people this will result in paying a lot less taxes. According to a CPA who was in management for 37 years with the IRS international division you may want to first apply for amnesty to avoid the criminal prosecution. Then you should compare the taxes that you owe with the deal that you usually get in appeals. You go to appeals as a result of opting out. In all of the situations that this ex IRS agent has seen, opting out gets you a much better IRS deal. If you want to reduce your taxes by using this strategy you need someone who is an expert in it with years of experience. I suggest you use a CPA who was in the international division of the IRS. If he also had experience with the appeals division you have the perfect professional to help you. The person that I interviewed for this article has this experience, and has been successful helping people.

Lance Wallach, National Society of Accountants Speaker of the Year and member of the AICPA faculty of teaching professionals, is a frequent speaker on retirement plans, abusive tax shelters, financial, international tax, and estate planning.  He writes about 412(i), 419, Section79, FBAR, and captive insurance plans. He speaks at more than ten conventions annually, writes for over fifty publications, is quoted regularly in the press and has been featured on television and radio financial talk shows including NBC, National Public Radio’s All Things Considered, and others. Lance has written numerous books including Protecting Clients from Fraud, Incompetence and Scams published by John Wiley and Sons, Bisk Education’s CPA’s Guide to Life Insurance and Federal Estate and Gift Taxation, as well as the AICPA best-selling books, including Avoiding Circular 230 Malpractice Traps and Common Abusive Small Business Hot Spots. He does expert witness testimony and has never lost a case. Contact him at 516.938.5007, wallachinc@gmail.com or visit http://www.taxadvisorexpert.com.



The information provided herein is not intended as legal, accounting, financial or any type of advice for any specific individual or other entity. You should contact an appropriate professional for any such advice.


12 comments:

  1. Thanks for sharing useful information. Indeed IRS Settlement was a big pain and it almost screwed my future, poor credit score and all worse that can happen. Still i was lucky to find few experts that helped in my irs debt settlement, irsmedic.com were experts and help me in IRS settlement quickly. I was helped, hope you will too.
    Reply
  2. www.taxaudit419.com to help fbar ovdi file opt out reduce fbar ovdi tax
    With the April 17 deadline to file income tax returns now upon us, U.S. taxpayers with foreign financial assets are finding out that they need to file some extra forms this year.

    The Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act, FATCA for short, requires any taxpayers to disclose on their tax returns for the tax year 2011 the location and amount of their foreign assets in excess of $50,000, or $100,000 for married couples.









FBAR/OVDI LANCE WALLACH: FBAR Offshore Bank Accounts and Foreign Income Att...

FBAR/OVDI LANCE WALLACH: FBAR Offshore Bank Accounts and Foreign Income Att...: You may want to think about participation in the IRS’ offshore tax amnesty program (called the Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Initiative). Do...



















What is the due date for the FBAR?
The due date for the FBAR is June 30th of each year.  
Can I put the FBAR on extension?
No. Unfortunately, there is no extension for the FBAR! The FBAR is not filed with a federal tax return. Any filing extensions of time granted by the IRS to file a tax return does not extend the time to file an FBAR.
What are the penalties for filing the FBAR (Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts) late?
There are 2 different types of penalties for not filing an FBAR by the due date – Non-Willful and Willful.
Maximum Penalty Non-willful:
  • $10,000. No penalty shall be imposed if the violation was due to reasonable cause and the amount of the transaction or the balance in the account at the time of the transaction was properly reported
Maximum Willful violations:
  • The greater of $100,000 or 50% of the balance of the account at the time of the violation
Penalty Mitigation-
The law provides a ceiling for the FBAR penalty. The actual penalty is left to the discretion of the examiner. The IRS has guidelines for its employees which allow them some discretion. If the IRS determined that a taxpayer meets the following four threshold conditions, that taxpayer may be subject to a penalty less than the maximum FBAR penalty
1. The person has no history of past FBAR penalty assessments;









taxadvisorexpert.com for ovdi fbar int tax amnesty help www.vebaplan.c - PandaHi

taxadvisorexpert.com for ovdi fbar int tax amnesty help www.vebaplan.c - PandaHi















Wednesday, April 10, 2013


IRS FBAR Voluntary Disclosure Initiative, opt out to reduce tax



 Lance Wallach


The 2012 OVDI, which is still open, is patterned after the 2011 OVDI, but increases the maximum Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts (FBAR)-related penalty from 25 percent to 27.5 percent of the highest account value at any time between 2003 and 2010. The 2012 OVDI does not have a stated expiration date. In all, the IRS has seen 33,000 voluntary disclosures from the 2009 and 2011 offshore initiatives. Since the 2011 program closed last September, hundreds of taxpayers have come forward to make voluntary disclosures.
Under the Bank Secrecy Act, U.S. residents or a person in and doing business in the U.S. must file a report with the government if they have a financial account in a foreign country with a value exceeding $10,000 at any time during the calendar year. Taxpayers comply with this law by reporting the account on their income tax return and by filing Form 90–22.1, the FBAR. Willfully failing to file an FBAR can be subject to both criminal sanctions (i.e., imprisonment) and civil penalties equivalent to the greater of $100,000 or 50 percent of the balance in an unreported foreign account — for each year since 2004 for which an FBAR wasn't filed.
The 2009 OVDP brought in at least 14,700 U.S. taxpayers (disclosing accounts in more than 60 countries) through the front door of IRS Criminal Investigation and untold thousands through a process of quietly amending returns and filing delinquent FBARs with the government. For eligible taxpayers who applied the OVDP provided the certainty of no criminal prosecution and civil penalty relief — they were required to pay back-taxes from 2003 to 2008, interest and a 20-25 percent penalty on the delinquent taxes. The IRS also imposed a 20 percent FBAR-related penalty equal to the highest aggregate value of the financial account between 2003 and 2008. In limited situations, the FBAR-related penalty could be reduced to five percent of the account value or $10,000 per tax year. If they got a great CPA with experience to help them, the fine was a lot less.
The 2011 OVDI, brought in an additional 12,000 eligible taxpayers who filed original and amended tax returns and agreed to make payments (or good-faith arrangements to pay) for taxes, interest and accuracy-related penalties. The 2011 OVDI FBAR-related penalty framework required a 25 percent “FBAR-related” penalty equal to the highest value of the financial account between 2003 and 2010. Only one 25 percent offshore penalty is to be applied with respect to voluntary disclosures relating to the same financial account. The penalty may be allocated among the taxpayers with beneficial ownership making the voluntary disclosures in any way they choose. . Participants in the 2011 OVDI also had to pay back-taxes and interest for up to eight years as well as paying accuracy-related and/or delinquency penalties. Subject to certain limitations, financial transactions occurring before 2003 were generally irrelevant for those participating in the OVDI. With good advice many people paid a lot less.
There are many considerations before a taxpayer should determine whether to pursue a voluntary disclosure of prior tax indiscretions. When reviewing the OVDP and the OVDI, many made decisions based on whether they could be considered a realistic candidate for a criminal prosecution referral by the IRS or prosecution by the Department of Justice. (If so, the determination to participate was relatively quick and easy). In other cases, the questions included:
  • Was there a possibility of reducing that prospect by filing amended or delinquent returns and FBARs in lieu of a direct participation in the OVDP/OVDI?
  • What would be the potentially applicable penalties upon an examination of such returns and FBARs?
  • Could the government actually carry their burden of demonstrating that the taxpayer “willfully” violated the FBAR filing requirements?
  • What would be the cost to the taxpayer of voluntary disclosure through OVDI versus remaining outside the program? Should they apply and then opt out?
Since the OVDI asserted an offshore penalty based on foreign financial accounts and asset valuations, for many with smaller financial account values the aggregate offshore penalty determination, even for multiple years, was actually less outside the OVDI.
The ability of a U.S. taxpayer to maintain an undisclosed, “secret” foreign financial account is fast becoming nonexistent. Foreign account information is flowing into the IRS under tax treaties, through submissions by whistle blowers, and from other taxpayers who participated in the 2009 OVDP and the 2011 OVDI who have been required to identify their bankers and advisers. Additional information will become available as the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA) foreign financial asset reporting (Form 8938 and new IRC § 6038D) become effective.
It is likely that the U.S. will require foreign financial institutions doing business in the United States to disclose account holders having relatively small accounts and earnings. There have been rumors of discussions regarding accounts having a high balance of the equivalent of $50,000 at any time between 2002 and 2010. U.S. persons having interests in foreign financial accounts should not find comfort in a belief that their foreign financial institution will somehow refrain from disclosing very small accounts in the current enforcement environment.
Taxpayers having undisclosed interests in foreign financial accounts must consult competent tax professionals before deciding to participate in the 2012 OVDI. Others may decide to risk detection by the IRS and the imposition of substantial penalties, including the civil fraud penalty, numerous foreign information return penalties, and the potential risk of criminal prosecution. Although the 2012 OVDI penalty regime may seem overly harsh for many, the decision to participate should include an economic analysis of the taxpayer's projected future earnings from funds held offshore. Some people have left the U.S. to try to avoid the fines.
Another option is to apply for amnesty and then opt out and go to appeals. We think that for most people this will result in paying a lot less taxes. According to a CPA who was in management for 37 years with the IRS international division you may want to first apply for amnesty to avoid the criminal prosecution. Then you should compare the taxes that you owe with the deal that you usually get in appeals. You go to appeals as a result of opting out. In all of the situations that this ex IRS agent has seen, opting out gets you a much better IRS deal. If you want to reduce your taxes by using this strategy you need someone who is an expert in it with years of experience. I suggest you use a CPA who was in the international division of the IRS. If he also had experience with the appeals division you have the perfect professional to help you. The person that I interviewed for this article has this experience, and has been successful helping people.

Lance Wallach, National Society of Accountants Speaker of the Year and member of the AICPA faculty of teaching professionals, is a frequent speaker on retirement plans, abusive tax shelters, financial, international tax, and estate planning.  He writes about 412(i), 419, Section79, FBAR, and captive insurance plans. He speaks at more than ten conventions annually, writes for over fifty publications, is quoted regularly in the press and has been featured on television and radio financial talk shows including NBC, National Public Radio’s All Things Considered, and others. Lance has written numerous books including Protecting Clients from Fraud, Incompetence and Scams published by John Wiley and Sons, Bisk Education’s CPA’s Guide to Life Insurance and Federal Estate and Gift Taxation, as well as the AICPA best-selling books, including Avoiding Circular 230 Malpractice Traps and Common Abusive Small Business Hot Spots. He does expert witness testimony and has never lost a case. Contact him at 516.938.5007, wallachinc@gmail.com or visit http://www.taxadvisorexpert.com.



The information provided herein is not intended as legal, accounting, financial or any type of advice for any specific individual or other entity. You should contact an appropriate professional for any such advice.


9 comments:

  1. Thanks for sharing useful information. Indeed IRS Settlement was a big pain and it almost screwed my future, poor credit score and all worse that can happen. Still i was lucky to find few experts that helped in my irs debt settlement, irsmedic.com were experts and help me in IRS settlement quickly. I was helped, hope you will too.
    Reply
  2. www.taxaudit419.com to help fbar ovdi file opt out reduce fbar ovdi tax
    With the April 17 deadline to file income tax returns now upon us, U.S. taxpayers with foreign financial assets are finding out that they need to file some extra forms this year.

    The Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act, FATCA for short, requires any taxpayers to disclose on their tax returns for the tax year 2011 the location and amount of their foreign assets in excess of $50,000, or $100,000 for married couples.

    The new requirement is in addition to the obligation to file a Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts, commonly known as an FBAR.


    Alan I. Appel


    The new FATCA requirement to disclose foreign assets means certain taxpayers who have foreign assets and income need to consider enrolling in the IRS’s Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Program, according to Bryan Cave LLP attorney Alan I. Appel. He chairs the U.S. Activities of Foreigners and Tax Treaties Committee of the American Bar Association’s Section of Taxation and is also an adjunct professor of law at New York Law School.

    “Right now, there are several aspects of FATCA,” he said in an interview last week. “For the first time with tax returns that are due on April 17, taxpayers are required to file a Form 8938 disclosing specified foreign financial assets.”

    The FBAR, which is filed with the Treasury Department rather than the IRS, is not the same as FATCA but “a very close cousin,” according to Appel.

    “Then we’ve got the question of FATCA for swap transactions under [Section] 871(m),” Appel pointed out. “We also have a 30 percent tax on withholding payments to foreign financial institutions and non-financial foreign entities.” The latter is not an immediate concern since it does not go into effect for over a year, but it is still raising a lot of red flags.

    “The FATCA withholding doesn’t go into effect until Jan. 1, 2014, and that’s designed to have foreign banks and other foreign entities that have U.S. taxpayers who have accounts be disclosed,” said Appel. “These foreign banks, which are called foreign financial institutions, or FFIs, and also foreign entities that are not banks—called non-financial foreign entities, or NFFEs—have to enter into a compliance agreement with the IRS starting Jan. 1, 2013, that they’ll agree to basically [disclose] the names, Social Security numbers and account balances of U.S. [account holders] every year,” said Appel. “And if they don’t enter into this agreement and they invest in U.S. stocks or securities, or have any U.S. source income, then there’s going to be a 30 percent withholding tax on all payments, including interest, rents, royalties, and things like that.”

    While those provisions don’t take effect until Jan. 1, 2014, Appel believes they are already having a major chilling effect on the rest of the world.
    ReplyDelete
  3. With the April 17 deadline to file income tax returns now upon us, U.S. taxpayers with foreign financial assets are finding out that they need to file some extra forms this year.

    The Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act, FATCA for short, requires any taxpayers to disclose on their tax returns for the tax year 2011 the location and amount of their foreign assets in excess of $50,000, or $100,000 for married couples.

    The new requirement is in addition to the obligation to file a Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts, commonly known as an FBAR.


    Alan I. Appel


    The new FATCA requirement to disclose foreign assets means certain taxpayers who have foreign assets and income need to consider enrolling in the IRS’s Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Program, according to Bryan Cave LLP attorney Alan I. Appel. He chairs the U.S. Activities of Foreigners and Tax Treaties Committee of the American Bar Association’s Section of Taxation and is also an adjunct professor of law at New York Law School.

    “Right now, there are several aspects of FATCA,” he said in an interview last week. “For the first time with tax returns that are due on April 17, taxpayers are required to file a Form 8938 disclosing specified foreign financial assets.”

    The FBAR, which is filed with the Treasury Department rather than the IRS, is not the same as FATCA but “a very close cousin,” according to Appel.

    “Then we’ve got the question of FATCA for swap transactions under [Section] 871(m),” Appel pointed out. “We also have a 30 percent tax on withholding payments to foreign financial institutions and non-financial foreign entities.” The latter is not an immediate concern since it does not go into effect for over a year, but it is still raising a lot of red flags.

    “The FATCA withholding doesn’t go into effect until Jan. 1, 2014, and that’s designed to have foreign banks and other foreign entities that have U.S. taxpayers who have accounts be disclosed,” said Appel. “These foreign banks, which are called foreign financial institutions, or FFIs, and also foreign entities that are not banks—called non-financial foreign entities, or NFFEs—have to enter into a compliance agreement with the IRS starting Jan. 1, 2013, that they’ll agree to basically [disclose] the names, Social Security numbers and account balances of U.S. [account holders] every year,” said Appel. “And if they don’t enter into this agreement and they invest in U.S. stocks or securities, or have any U.S. source income, then there’s going to be a 30 percent withholding tax on all payments, including interest, rents, royalties, and things like that.”

    While those provisions don’t take effect until Jan. 1, 2014, Appel believes they are already having a major chilling effect on the rest of the world.

    Lance Wallach

    Lance Wallach, Managing Director, is the
    nation's leading expert on employee benefit plans,
    tax problem resolution and IRS audit defense.

    Mr. Wallach is a member of the AICPA faculty of
    teaching professionals & a renowned national
    expert in many court cases. He is the author of
    many best selling financial & law books, including:

    * "Wealth Preservation Planning" by the
    National Society of Accountants

    * "The CPA's Guide to Federal & Estate
    Gift Taxation" published by Bisk

    * The AICPA's "The team approach to Tax,
    Financial & Estate planning."

    * "The CPA's Guide to Life Insurance" by
    Bisk CPEasy

    * Avoiding Circular 230 Malpractice Traps
    and Common Abusive Small Businesss Hot
    spots by the AICPA, author/moderator
    Lance Wallach
    ReplyDelete